Skip to main content

Ideation Exercise

Information Collection Tools

Information Collection Tools

by Amelia Chik Abdullah - Number of replies: 6

1. The 5-Whys and the Fishbone Diagram are some of the few Root Cause Analysis (RCA) tools commonly used to identify problems. Is it common to use all the tools at one go to identify the problems and collect data from each analysis? In doing so, will this skew the results or give different interpretation of the actual problem itself?   

2. What levels of the organisation should be involved in any investigation or doing the RCA? Some organisations may only leave to the senior management and not involve different levels across the company. Do you think this will not give better results since not accessing to more variety of perspectives and skills/knowledge levels?

Thank you.
In reply to Amelia Chik Abdullah

Re: Information Collection Tools

by Peter Brace -
Thanks for the questions, Amelia. I'm interested in the views of other participants on these questions but to get started I'd suggest the following ideas:

1. In line with the KIS principle (Keep It Simple!), and the fact that the 5-Whys will tend to focus in on a single root cause, this might be the first approach to try. But if multiple, overlapping causes start to show up, then the Fishbone technique, although it may take longer and use more resources, would likely provide a more effective analysis. Both techniques, when used properly, should provide enough information to identify the solution.

2. This would likely vary depending on the nature of the problem being examined, but also the culture of the organisation. Think of problem-solving meetings where people at different levels in the organisation participate. The "lower levels" may be there to provide their practical experience of the issue - but do they feel free to contribute, or even challenge the established way of doing things? Peer groups making recommendations to management might be the best way to go in some organisations. In others, people of all levels might be able to work together on a diagnosis and fix.

Can any participants give their experiences of these different ways of problem solving?
In reply to Peter Brace

Re: Information Collection Tools

by Loo Shao Chuo -
Hi, Peter. I agree with your viewpoint for the 1st question. However sometimes it is hard to determine on which method are the best to practice, For example, we only focus on one root cause from the beginning. But in the middle of the process, we find out that have others branches that may affect the root cause, Then, we will need to change and migrate from KIS & 5 why's to fishbone.
In reply to Loo Shao Chuo

Re: Information Collection Tools

by Thevaraj Victor -

The need to switch and adapt methods to suit varying circumstances and situations is a constant. Though hard in practice, it cannot be ignored if the objective is to obtain meaningful and effective problem-solving outcomes. 

Thank you.

In reply to Thevaraj Victor

Re: Information Collection Tools

by Peter Brace -
Another great point, Theva. Do any of our participants have a comment about the difficulties involved in being flexible and adaptable, particularly in large organisations?
In reply to Peter Brace

Re: Information Collection Tools

by Thevaraj Victor -
1. Yes, as suggested, a number of variables need to be taken into account in determining which would be an appropriate tool to use and how best to use it and under what circumstances. A key variable, in addition to the nature of the problem and prevailing organisational culture, is the 'people' factor. Do all members have the self-confidence to freely express themselves, would they feel intimidated by a mix of participants who may include those of higher ranks and so on need to be carefully considered.

2. In using the different tools, it would help if a brief on the problem is circulated, in sufficient advance, to all participants.

Thank you.
In reply to Thevaraj Victor

Re: Information Collection Tools

by Peter Brace -
Many thanks for your input, Theva. Important points, definitely, and briefing the participants in advance will certainly prime the discussion and get things started more quickly.
Back to Main